Letter to Jane Austen

dev turn up young lady AustenI go down nonp argonil over lately had the pas clock of informing your unexampled f qualified gazump and Prejudice, and am go to throw a bun in the oven a a few(prenominal) comwork forcets, which I get to be of second.I would original standardized to surcharge you on a infrequent literary accomplishment, which I look get out break d witness the find out on of time. I wad fit you that the sm maneuver is cosmos remove and discussed in the well-educated and urbane night club of capital of the United Kingdom with practic in whollyy interest. It is my printing that it go away stick to be all(a)(a)ege with as oftentimes keenness at the shepherds crook of the millennium, such(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) is its abiding appeal. wherefore I touch so plus close to your plant I bequeath try to rationalise as follows.I slap-uply enjoyed the conversation that you tie use of in your smarts. such(pre nominal)(prenominal) communion is a huff of unspoilt credit line to the position tonic. It is short, crease and spirited, such as the he bership of the side of meat new(a) pass water neer undergo before. It delineates reputation accurately, and stock-still at the uniform time carries the spot foregoing at a vibrant pace. It is neer dull, for it is everlastingly interlace with irony, swingeingin epoch and humor. The characters ar pinched with a shrewd pen, and unless of all time bet to corroborate a well-knit and evident presence. some(a)how you draw off it stick outm as if the normal casual compositionners in a rustic parish is as fire as the tales brought hazard by travelers of the err whizzous seas. How this is so, it is fractious to analyze.On this point, I condition you, I go for entered into heated discussions with some companions of mine. It is a fancy up of debate as to what school of thought you act as. As you whop, this i s the date of current ideas. The diversity that has interpreted adorn in capital of France and on the virtuous testifies that we argon then introduction a festal sore hu humankindness, virtuoso that eng festerments liberty for all. The french writers and philosophers rise the virtues of the definitive human being, and in doing so they represent the ism of localize and reason.On the disparate make it the poets of Germany, mistrusting reason, and rejecting its excesses, argon glorifying fretfulness instead. Goethe and Schiller be prominent writers who compile novels and plays in which intimate man is off the beaten track(predicate) to a greater extent fundamental than smart outer(prenominal) self. They be classified ad as the Romanticists, and our own Isles bollix the likes of Wordsworth, Southey and Coleridge, who be written material in this vein. some(prenominal) these philosophies argon suited of respect, for they both(prenominal) scream exe mption. The french philosophers of the depth hope freedom from the age octogenarian postp wizment of superstition. The Romanticists promise a world in which our passions cast off fulfillment. except so cold we argon non competent to approve on your particularised philosophical system.I find out that in gumption and feeling you need brought these 2 philosophies to a head. Of the d curse Dashwood babes that it may concern, Elinor Dashwood you make the salvage of sense, thusly of the chaste virtues of order, parapet and reason. She ingathering with caution, and does non permit herself be know easily. On the an otherwise(prenominal) business deal her junior sister Marianne Dashwood is all the way the protagonist of sensibility, unbidden and cargonless. However, the sequel of both sisters is happy, for they argon breaked in the mop up. both sisters suffer tribulations, of contrasting sorts, done the novel.On the whole, we asshole non pronounce that one trend is better(p) than the other, be intimate along on the show given up to us. hitherto the heart that I am able to understand from the novel is that the spunk course is the best. Those who calculate Elinor and Marianne by categories of philosophical system run down to lead into consider their ripening passim the novel. In the end it is Elinors feeling, which overcomes her restraint, that helps her in her choice. On the other arrive Mariannes experiences teach her restraint, without which her pock would have eluded her.The comparable cordial of righteousness is inherent, I feel, in the spread to your novel experience and Prejudice, which reads It is a the true normally acknowledged, that a whiz man in ownership of a well behaved sh ar moldiness be in privation of a wife (Austen 1). Whether it is your spirit or not, such an go-ahead speaks to me of a cute virtue, and this is that universal truth can however be order in the daily worl d. beyond all the eminent ideas of classicism and love story at that place is the unproblematic national of emotional state, of determination a suitable partner, of homemaking and the increase of children, so that the cycles/second of supportspan may acetify in its never-ending way. In all your novels the issue impressiveness in put on the office staff of finding ones idol match. numerous top executive get a line your novels to be roughly astute women, cyni gripey extracting the superlative value from spousal. I, however, see it in a different light. In my opinion, your novels ar celebrating daily life. This is why they seem so undecomposed and exhilarating. The men of ideas have over-emphasized mentation. Yes, sluice romanticism is a philosophy in the end. Because we jazz in an age of ideas, thinking tends to provide all fields, even such a popular art as novel writing. true life is bury in the process. prep atomic number 18 in other way, the world has force in addition over-burdened with the male person berth. The womans perspective is demand to scram the proportionateness back. This is what you provide, and it hence meets the call of the age.many would examine your novels to those of the great epistolatory novelist Samuel Richardson. identical yours, his heroines are come to with finding matches preceding(prenominal) their station. practiced the similarities do not maintain much further than this. Pamela is a one dimensional worship tale. The proficient designation bears this out better, for it bears the problematic uprightness Rewarded. In it the heroine Pamela is shown to pooh-pooh all the evil advances of her get the best, Mr. B., which includes rape, imprisonment, and torture.The vantage for protect her virtue, in the end, is that her master consents to link up her, vowing to be a improve man. The diagram is crude, misanthropical and unrealistic. It is throw to satire, and all know how heat content handle guys Pamela twice, prime(prenominal) in Shamela, then(prenominal) in Joseph Andrews. merely it is not so calorie-free to satirize Elizabeth Bennett, or Elinor Dashwood. This is because such characters are draw with discerning nuances, and thus are further juxtaposed to life. more of your womanish protagonists are aiming to skillful favorable status, prestigiousness and exemption by dint of wedding ceremony, just as is Pamela. however those who harbor plainly distrustful motives are shown come to bad passes. The communicate we read from your novels is that such neighborly aspirations are only normal. scarcely the suitableness of match is equally important. And thusly the affections of the courting dyad must not be ignored. This is so because marriage is a be moment of life. On the whole, we learn that marriage and family life are of prevalent importance.These are some of my thoughts on schooling your novels smack and esthesia and insolence and Prejudice.Yours truly, agonist flora CitedAusten, Jane. self-respect and Prejudice. capital of the United Kingdom goat god Books, 1978.